Emails from Mark Neuman Summit 1031 to Crystal L. Cox - Investigative Blogger

Date: Friday, July 24, 2009, 4:52 PM

"" No. The settlement is in regard to any remaining assets that the principals have left.

Like household assets, cars, personal residences, other personal property, Basically anything that was on the excluded asset list on the partial summary judgment agreement.

If they weren't interested in dealing with the office furniture, they shouldn't be interested in much that we have left.

We've had to sell most anything with value to pay attorneys and live.

Pension funds are excluded by law.


Seems to me that, like the eToys case, that you've got to watch that they don't sell anything to their buddies or related entities.

I'm not sure that is their play because most of the bare land will now be a long time coming before it pops.

A good portion is in Bend and the economy is going to take a very long time to recover here.

You know we had 72 acres in Columbia Falls that was approved for development on the east side of the bridge. Do you know if they put it on the market?

None of the members have been informed if they have.

Look at who listed and who they say is the owner.

If it is like the Corney listing, they have given false ownership names etc.

I need to get the Corney listing from a Bend realtor for you.

Did that answer your question?

We are on the road in the middle of the Cascades....beautiful!!

My son is driving so I can review info.

Mark  ""